Find out exactly what AI coding agents can do in your development team. I point working agents at your real repos and workflows, then hand you a roadmap and one quick win, already installed.
AI coding agents are past the experiment stage. The teams using them well ship noticeably faster. But between "a developer tried it once" and "the team runs on it" sits a set of decisions almost nobody has made: which workflows, which guardrails, which supervision habits, which tasks to hand over first. The audit answers those questions for your team, with evidence from your own codebase.
I run real AI agents against your repos, build setup, and dev workflow. The report shows where agents will work today, where they will fail, and why. Findings, not theory.
Which workflows to hand to agents first, in what order, with what expected gain. Sized for your team, not copied from a conference talk.
I do not just recommend. Before the week ends, one real workflow on one team is running under agent supervision, using CC Director, the open source mission control I built and use myself.
A working session with your dev leads. I walk the findings, the roadmap, and the installed win, and answer the questions that decide whether this sticks.
A 45 minute call with your dev lead. We agree the target repos and the one workflow that hurts most. You grant read access. That is the last meeting until Friday.
My agents work your codebase while I evaluate the results: what they handle, where they stall, what your setup makes hard. I build the roadmap and install the quick win.
You receive the report and roadmap, see the installed workflow running, and I hold the walkthrough session with your leads. Everything is yours to keep, whatever you decide next.
Center Consulting is me, Soren Frederiksen, plus the agent fleets, and that is the point. My development runs on AI coding agents, every day, supervised through CC Director, the open source mission control I built because I needed it. The method I audit your team against is the method I use myself, daily, on real work. I am also CTO and co-founder of mindzie, the process intelligence platform, in production with enterprise customers. You get the person who built all of it, not a junior staffed in my name.
Read-only access to one or more repositories, under NDA. I work on my own machines, retain nothing after delivery, and can work entirely on-screen with your team for codebases that cannot leave the building.
No. The method is tool-agnostic and CC Director itself runs Claude Code, Gemini, and local models side by side. I audit against your stack, and part of the roadmap is which model fits which of your workflows.
About 45 minutes from a lead developer on day one, and a one hour walkthrough on day five. The point of the audit is that I do the work, not you.
One real workflow from your backlog, running under agent supervision on one team before the week ends. A test-coverage sweep, a documentation pass, a dependency update pipeline, whatever your codebase says is the right first candidate. Something your team can watch working, not a slide about potential.
No. Agents run under accounts configured for no training retention, and my report contains findings about your process, not your source code.
That is the Agentic Team Installation, a fixed-price two to three week sprint where I install the full method in one of your teams. The audit fee is credited against it. No obligation either way; the roadmap is yours.
Or you will keep wondering, and so will your competitors. One of those is free.
Book your audit. $1,950 flat.